In that communion fullness of grace lives and brings fruit.
Communion of love cannot close the door for anyone.
Beauty (glory) of God shines in people good will; not as a rewarding light shining on them but as a flower's beauty. Good will reflects in virtues, but in them, what invites to God's beauty is the sincere labour one makes to keep the good will always.
Where do we experience, share, and hold this beauty other than in our physical-biological reality? It is sacramental. All theo-logics spoke about that aspect of us which we call soul. Rarely they considered the physicality in contemplating human reality. Christ's very incarnation speaks primarily of being human. He dwelt among us that we may be fully human. We be his body, sacramentally and physically.Faith is a responsible and mature choice for a deep relationship. Often our 'faith' ends up in believing in magic. Making God or Christ a hero is the worst crisis of our faith. A hero deserves fascination, not trust. The hero enters the scene, and everything is brought to what we wish.
The manger at Bethlehem deserves faith, not amusement. There is poverty and shame, and the presence of the hated. A hero does not involve himself in such 'human' realities.An anointing and the presence of the anointed one is an experience of salvation over our wilderness. It is faith that gives light to see the messiah even when Messiah enters our life not with glory and power but with kindness and mercy. All will be gathered in the heart of the messiah. Messiah is a connect between humanity and divinity, between creation and the divine. We have repeatedly crucified the Messiah even before he would be born in us by making him a deity. He is divine, one substance with God. Deifying constrains the divine into some forms and make an object of cult. Messiah liberates, but a deity-messiah blinds.
The gospel is a life-outline for living with the Messiah, and living in him. Gospel opens our heart to relive him, not to deify him. All who have got the light of faith come with their own perfumes, lowers, music and songs. If Messiah lives and our definitions go insignificant, the friends of the bridegroom still rejoice. Friends who have no faith, keep guarding the bridegroom's room.
Do Christians really believe in 'incarnation' that God really became a human being? However Christian imaginations are generally about super-naturals, victories, and triumph. Is it not abominable to imagine Jesus or Mary having a romantic feeling? Were not thousands of generations open to natural graces that open the channels of race towards a supernatural grace of Immaculate Conception? It is easy to glorify God 'becoming' bread (which is not correct. Eucharistic presence is Christ in the form of bread), but difficult to accept God acting in natural ways/laws. In the first, there is a miraculous wonder, in the second, it is a call to relate our life to God so naturally as we are.
We are habituated to binarize between good and evil. There are often many things that cook up evil, but remain invisible or unnoticed. These constructive elements may be disguised within the very things we have categorized as good and holy. This chosen good reflects the cruelty of our hypocritical judgements.
Where will we place God in this good-evil creation? Which is a holy people, a leader, or a nation? Truth is unconcealed only when there is kindness and compassion. So, God cannot take sides. If we put God into our chosen good and maintain the disguised evil, surely, we will also promote evil-making structures in the name of God. It can create rituals, customs and even history.
Truth is grey and lives pass through varied struggles of good and evil. There are chosen evils and imposed evils. The light of truth is in the honesty of heart which is rarely known.
The owner would make a mark on his animals as a sign that it belonged to him. Many groups of people also had certain marks of them as an identity of the particular group.
Circumcision marked the sign of the covenant with God as one belonged to God. But the law-covenant bond followed a pattern forbidding to safeguard the purity of the covenant.
Covenant of grace is inviting, not forbidding. Its a belonging to Christ, being in him, he being in us, and we all being in him. The imprint of Christ is the mark of the new covenant, sign of being loved and found by Christ. Reception of baptism does not guarantee this imprint in us. Covenant of grace takes us to a communion, producing its fruits.
Christ suffered, but it was not because he suffered that he became the Messiah. He is the Life-bearer/ grace-bearer for humanity and, of course, for the entire creation even before the incarnation. He poured out his life that we may have life. His suffering and self-emptying were life-giving.
Christ poured out his life as a ransom for many when Kings and priests gathered power and wealth. There is a king in the palace, there is a high priest in the temple. Our high priest is one among us being a source of life for us all.
Here, the question comes to the disciples: Can you drink the cup I have to drink? It is not simply about a readiness to suffer. It is about an attitude of becoming a ransom that offers life. One works, suffers, serves, and thus flowers, but we need to see what fruits are produced from these flowers. Are they life-giving fruits?
Life is non-sided, and the authority of life spans beyond boundaries. Disciples looked for power and position even in relation with Christ, because they understood him within the frames of powerful and wealthy priests and kings, not according to the nature of life.
The kingdom of God has no boundaries of languages, cultures, and religions. If the gospel we have heard and interpreted has not liberated us to understand that God loves everyone, we have not listened to the Gospel. The rightness, trueness, and power of the gospel are in the freedom and peace that all humanity can experience. Taking religion into public spheres under the disguise of devotion, worship, and witness rarely does any act of faith. Instead, they are attempts of religious supremacy, an expression devoid of freedom.
God's glory is where 'the righteousness and peace' is realised. This righteousness cannot be restricted to any religious rule or the super-spread of any religion. 'Peace on earth' is what is pleasing to God rather than victories of religions.
Those who have entered heaven with a sure ticket have their heaven, salvation, and Christ smaller than the chairs they are enthroned in. They celebrate loneliness in their heaven because they have kept all ‘others’ away. Unfortunately, they found no one on the way worthy of being with them in heaven, probably because their journey had been lonely.
When Pope Francis compared different religions to different
languages, it is an endorsement of the multiplicity of religious manifestations
and a call to partake in dialogue and mutual understanding. It does not refute
the Church’s doctrines on salvation. Instead, it emphasises the necessity for respect,
openness, and cooperation among people of different faiths.
Pope Francis’s likening of different religions to different
languages is very much within the framework of the Catholic Church’s doctrines
on interreligious dialogue and reverence for various religious traditions. The
Catholic Church acknowledges the significance and inherent value of other
religions and posits that they can function as channels for human capacity for God.
The concept of ‘no salvation outside the church’ has evolved
over time. While historically, it has been interpreted to signify that
salvation is exclusively attainable within the Catholic Church, the Second
Vatican Council and subsequent teachings have underscored the potential for
salvation among those who, without their own fault, lack knowledge of Christ or
his Church, yet earnestly seek what God wills and strives to fulfil. If someone
continues to imagine heaven as adherence to the imperial Christendom, that has
little to do with the heaven that Jesus introduced.
What should the Pope have said, “You wretched people, you
have no salvation unless you all become Christians?” The world might ask, “What
shall we do then?” “Believe in Christ!” “What does this ‘believe in Christ’
mean?” “Which Christ should we believe, Eastern or Western, Catholic or Protestant?
Your Christ is a need for the Western guilt culture. We have read from the
bible a different Christ who called the world to the freedom and joy of the
children of God. Being in a Christian sect does not seem to be a necessity.”
Christ, the Logos, has many languages, reveals in diverse
cultures and histories. His grace is visible throughout history in the goodwill
of millions of people whom we meet them in our daily lives. The Church is wherever
the body of Christ extends, by its members seeking to do the will of God.
Is there anything wrong in saying, “We need to keep meeting,
to weave bonds of fraternity and to allow ourselves to be guided by the divine
inspiration present in every faith, in order to join in “imagining peace” among
all peoples. We need such “occasions to speak with one another and to act
together for the common good and the promotion of the poor”. In a world at risk
of being fragmented by conflicts and wars, the efforts made by believers are
invaluable for holding out visions of peace and fostering fraternity and peace
among peoples everywhere.” Message of Pope Francis to participants in the
international meeting for peace organised by the community of Sant’egidio Paris,
22-24 September 2024.
I understand that Pope Francis also believes that Christ is
the way, the truth and the life. He has not made the statement all of a sudden
from nowhere. It has been in the vision of interreligious dialogue initiatives
of the Church. The interreligious dialogue was not seen as an exercise by some
intellectuals. Instead, it is in the form of the Church’s being. As ‘through
him, and for him, and in him’ everything is made, the Word has been visible and
present in culture and history. Christ has a much wider space than Christian religious
culture and language.
Pope said that religions are like many languages that speak of God, not that there are many Gods. Was Christianity itself a perfect and whole language that spoke of God in every way and every time? Unfortunately, the present controversy itself is a language that speaks of the church and its attitudes. If there is crisis in Christian identity, what is that identity which is in crisis? What is the form of Christian/catholic identity in need of revival? Can that be comprised of certain cultural values, beliefs, prestigious achievements and so on? They do have the risk of being symbols/language without meaning, looking for the beauty of style over the message.
Tomb was not an unfamiliar place for Mary Magdalene.
Can 'the Lord' be contained in such a tomb weighed under darkness?Thomas was not the Way, but a pilgrim on the way just as John the baptizer was not the Word but a voice crying out in the wilderness. Thomas was on the way just like any other disciple to the ultimate confession, 'my Lord and God.' In John's gospel everyone, one way or the other, go through a growth; some in their fear of shame, some in darkness, some in blindness, some in thirst, some in the cruelty of death come to him for a light of hope. Everyone needs to walk through a certain difficulty of 'unbelief' yet an irresistible need for the Messiah.
Among the guests of Herod, perhaps there was so much laughter and celebration, noise and cheer. On other side, the last groaning still may h...